Rural Democrats differ with Barack Obama - Lisa Lerer and Jonathan Martin - POLITICO.com
Share your thoughts...
Friday, July 9, 2010
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
Monday, June 21, 2010
Why this blog..........
Simple answer....it was needed.
Living in Juneau County, Wisconsin as a vocal and active liberal is not an easy task. While in the last presidential election the county went for Obama (people voted for hope) the standard is that it is a red county with some very powerful Republicans running the show.
When I first moved up here from the Chicagoland area in 2002 I was not prepared for the culture shock I suffered. It had nothing to do with the slower pace but rather the status quo of if you're a liberal living here...you do so in silence and out of the fear that if your employers and friends found out your left of center viewpoints, you'd be an outcast...and one on unemployment.
I never was able to swallow that bitter pill....
But even harder to swallow was how if you took that risk and spoke up, like minded people and politicians in the larger more populated areas would grasp on to you to help promote their cause...their campaign...but in return you often heard a "No" when you asked them to reciprocate and show up to help you build a larger base among the cornfields and dairy farms that dot the landscape. The reasoning most could understand ..as why should they concentrate and effort in an area that wont make or break them?...but for me, I see it as more why wouldn't you want to help create a terrrain of voters that WOULD help to make or break that campaign...and support those of us who saccrafice more than just a few hours of volunteer time canvassing or manning the phones??
Also having been a liberal from an urban and suburban area to now one that lives in the center of rural USA - I also know that perceptions on issues that bond us all can be quite different...
So...all that being said...is the reason for this blog and website - a chance to highlight the voices who do take those risks in not only speaking up but also acting upon their liberal viewpoints and beliefs in a terrain where the grain works against them.
Time to honor the voice that is not often heard ...The Progressive Voice of Rural Wisconsin.
If you care to join us ...have that opinion you want to share...know of a rural progressive event that others should know about...then please contact us at The Progressive Voice of Rural Wisconsin
Until then.........enjoy...and share!
And now a special thank you to the women who made it possible for me to begin this new road in front of me....
We're at it again......
Once again we have to take a stance against the powers that be forcing their views and ideals down our throats. Apparently there's talk of doubling the cost for liquor licenses and taking other measures to 'change the drinking culture' in our area. To me this reads as 'how can we run even more business out of the area and make sure people don't partake in things we look down our noses at'. This may be a bit of a stretch but I doubt it. Drinking is legal, being in a bar is legal. Leave it alone. We all know drinking way too much is a bad thing and I don't think the laws are tough enough on these folks that have several DUI's. That being said, I lost the love of my life to drinking and driving. If anyone should have a stance on drunk driving it would be me. But he made the choice to drink more than he could handle(with the encouragement of several of his so called friends) and paid the ultimate price. My son and I will be forever changed because of it and will never stop feeling a major sense of loss.
Still I believe that it all boils down to personal choice with a large emphasis on personal responsibility. More and more these days we have a group of 'know it alls' trying to tell everyone how to live their lives. Too many of our personal freedoms are being taken away little by little and we don't even know it. They're trying to create a Stepford culture by taking away personal choice one little thing at a time. We're headed towards a prohibition and trust me the holier than thous are gearing up to make it happen. Most of them are pretty sneaky about their intent also. Why do you think every few years they shave a little off of the legal limit of alcohol? Because they know people won't go for a huge drop, but a little here a little there, and all of a sudden a sniff of wine and you're going to jail.
Still I believe that it all boils down to personal choice with a large emphasis on personal responsibility. More and more these days we have a group of 'know it alls' trying to tell everyone how to live their lives. Too many of our personal freedoms are being taken away little by little and we don't even know it. They're trying to create a Stepford culture by taking away personal choice one little thing at a time. We're headed towards a prohibition and trust me the holier than thous are gearing up to make it happen. Most of them are pretty sneaky about their intent also. Why do you think every few years they shave a little off of the legal limit of alcohol? Because they know people won't go for a huge drop, but a little here a little there, and all of a sudden a sniff of wine and you're going to jail.
Rural is Local
Rural is Local by Tom Crofton
One of the truly hopeful trends emerging in these difficult times is a return to local production of many of the things we need. Top on the list are food and fuel, and no longer are the local production of these considered fringe activities.
Fully 15% of our State’s Gross Domestic Product is exported out of the state for energy. In boom times this climbs to 22%. The local production of energy can keep those dollars in our counties and double our local economic bases. The multiplier effect of money spent in a region is 8-10 times the initial amount. As workers get paid and then spend their wages in the grocery or hardware stores, or buy homes, or dine out at restaurants they recycle that cash in the region, over and over again.
Economic reasons alone can convince us that we need to make our energy locally. The “Green Jobs” we keep hearing about are real and necessary. The additional results of reducing greenhouse gases and chemical pollution, and the reduction of risky oil drilling and mountaintop removal are the gravy for our homemade biscuits.
Which brings us back to food: why are we so willing to accept lousy food in our own homes, much less our schools and commercial establishments; when we live in a paradise of agricultural riches? The cost of raw materials vs. the cost of processed food has been documented but bears repeating. A one lb potato costing a dime at harvest time fills a 13 oz. bag of potato chips costing $3.59, (and on and on.) Neither economic, nor gastronomic justice will come from modifying that system. The middlemen are the same ones who play the commodities game and the stock market without ever adding value.
Fortunately, many of us have developed alternative marketing and purchasing avenues that keep the food near homes and reduce the processing and the speculation. These are small, intertwined with multiple networks, use some volunteer labor, and serve to distribute local products to those in the loop. (My family sells our maple syrup for half the “commodity price” to our food buying club members, and we all gain.) This kind of practice, sharing beef cattle and using local butcher shops for example, can and should continue on forever, but is not enough. We need a larger vision.
It’s time to paint a picture of a local/regional energy/food system that is sustainable and goes beyond efforts of small groups. As the saying goes, “all politics is local”, and a local political climate is developing that can deliver leadership to double the nearby economy, bring healthy foods to schools, do our part in reducing fossil fuel use, turning local government operating costs into revenue streams, and lowering taxes. State, County, and municipal governments could (should) take the lead to find places where home-grown energy can replace their “store bought” version and keep the bucks at home. The methods will differ in each area, but here’s a few places to start:
Diesel Fuel: My county buys a least a million dollars of road and equipment fuel a year, and is currently running a half million dollar deficit The standard rap is that we need to cut services or raise taxes. What if we contracted to local farmers to raise canola or a similar oilseed crop? We could purchase it from them at the going rate ($350 /ton.). We would press out the oil (one ton of crop per acre, 100 gallons of oil per ton), and sell the byproduct for a 38% protein, high value feed for nearly the same $350. (Canola oil burns in Diesel engines in warm weather with no additional treatment.) We could use stimulus or energy grant funding to help set it up. We could partner with local feed co-ops to market the feed, and let them use the $1 per gallon blending credit that we can’t use as a governmental unit. Our fuel dollar savings would more than eliminate our deficits in the first year, and then go on as tax reduction possibilities from then on. The local farmers would have a chance to see the process and decide to use it for themselves. Small co-ops of neighboring farmers could share a small press (a few thousand dollars) and have fresh cattle feed and fuel as they needed it. The local government could introduce the crop and the process to the area (it’s used in Europe and Asia extensively) and go beyond traditional reaction to external events and fluctuating revenues from taxes to create their own revenue stream.
Space Heat: Our area schools and local governments are all in financial troubles and they all buy lots of electricity and space heating fuel. At the same time, our counties and towns mow along the roads and chip trees and brush regularly. This bio-mass, along with thinned woodlots, plantation of fast growing trees, and fields of switchgrass can be processed into charcoal bricks to fire these buildings’ heating systems and to make electricity. Local loggers currently have no market for the thinnings and tree tops they create while harvesting timber. The decentralization of our power grid to use many small bio-mass plants for generating electricity and space heat is the wave of the future. We don’t need coal or oil. Bio-mass is carbon neutral, it emits the carbon pulled from the atmosphere while growing, and the new forest absorbs it back in. Advanced technologies such as Pyrolization leave a carbon powder as the end product that can be used as a soil amendment to sequester carbon in the ground (carbon reducing).
The jobs from this process are the immediate gain for the area. Special equipment to mow switchgrass on roadside banks or to grind up broken trees can be made in our region. Small local businesses can expand their operations. Governmental units will bring in revenue from traditional operating expenses. We could lower taxes.
Electricity: Every public building should generate more electricity from renewable energy than it uses. Operating costs become revenue streams. Solar, wind , bio-mass, canola powered diesel generators, the list goes on and varies from what each local area offers, but the idea is the same. Generate the primary energy, use the waste as something else.
Which brings me to the local bio-mass fired electrical generating plant operating in the industrial park of Small Town WI where the area sawmills, loggers, farmers, and governmental units bring in their material, it’s converted to charcoal, makes more electricity than the town requires, and uses the waste heat to warm the buildings in the park, and to grow produce in greenhouses nearby to feed the townsfolk and the salad bars at the schools.
Local food (agriculture) provides the fuel to power itself (oilseed crops) and the generating plant (bio-mass); and the generating plant grows the food (tomatoes in winter.) I’m talking about a sustainable, local, economy doubling, property-tax-lowering bridge to the future. That future can be peaceful (no wars for oil), those jobs can pay a living wage (rebuild the middle class), with health care (single payer anyone?) and retirement for all .
I say : It’s about issues and ideas.
You ask:Is that politics?
I reply: I am convinced that this is the politics of the present and the implementation needs to be from the lowest level. We can connect with state and national programs, but the heavy lifting needs to be done at home.
But you ask: What about electing people to office?
And I say: How do they stand on the issues?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)